Difference between revisions of "Talk:Media denial"
From Conservapedia
(→‎Parody?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::If it's going to stay could it be improved by linking to some examples of media denial? And cite some reports why the examples given are clearly true?--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 11:04, 4 September 2008 (EDT) | ::If it's going to stay could it be improved by linking to some examples of media denial? And cite some reports why the examples given are clearly true?--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 11:04, 4 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: Good idea, please try... --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 11:07, 4 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:07, September 4, 2008
Parody?
Since the user who created this article has just been blocked as the sock of a parodist, can this article be safely deleted?
- Sysop J.Martinez doesn't seem to think there's a problem with it. And there's nothing in this article which is not echoed elsewhere on CP. If this is parody, so are all of the other CP terms...AliceBG 10:53, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
- I think it could be read as a parody (it certainly doesn't read as encyclopedic) and since it was created by a parodist who has since been blocked I don't think it's a stretch.
- If it's going to stay could it be improved by linking to some examples of media denial? And cite some reports why the examples given are clearly true?--JohnD 11:04, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
- Good idea, please try... --User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez, talk 11:07, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
